What is a female actor called?

What is a female actor called?

Exploring the Terminology and Evolution of Gendered Language in the Acting World

(By Ray Reese)

When it comes to the world of acting, many people wonder what term should be used to describe a female performer. Traditionally, the term “actor” has been used as a gender-neutral term, but there has been a long-standing debate about whether there should be a separate term specifically for female performers. For many years, the word “actress” was used exclusively to describe female performers, but in recent times, the industry has seen a shift back to using “actor” for both men and women. So, what is the correct term, and why has this debate persisted?

The distinction between “actor” and “actress” is tied to a broader conversation about gender and language. Historically, English often used separate terms to distinguish between male and female professionals in various fields, but as gender roles have evolved, many have questioned the necessity of these distinctions. The debate about whether a female actor should be called an “actress” or simply “actor” continues to be relevant today. To understand why, we need to explore the origins of these terms and how they have evolved over time.

The word “actor” originates from the Latin word “actor,” meaning “doer” or “one who acts.” It was historically used in the context of both male and female performers, though gendered terms began to emerge in English over time. By the 18th century, the term “actress” had been coined to specifically refer to a female performer. The suffix “-ess” was often added to words to indicate a female gender, as was common in the English language at the time.

For example, words like “waitress,” “princess,” and “lioness” followed a similar pattern, where the “-ess” was added to distinguish the female counterpart. In the case of “actress,” the term became widely accepted as the proper way to refer to women who performed on stage or screen.

However, as the role of women in society and in the entertainment industry began to change, the term “actress” started to feel increasingly outdated and unnecessary to many. The rise of feminist movements and the push for gender equality in the 20th century led to a reevaluation of language and its implications.

In recent decades, there has been a significant shift toward gender-neutral language in many professions, and acting is no exception. The argument for using “actor” for both men and women is rooted in the desire to eliminate unnecessary gender distinctions, which are often seen as perpetuating outdated stereotypes. Many believe that referring to all performers as “actors” emphasizes the skill and craft of the profession rather than focusing on gender.

Using “actor” as a gender-neutral term allows the profession to be viewed on equal footing, regardless of the performer’s sex. This shift has been especially prevalent in the entertainment industry, where leading women have begun to speak out against gendered language. Actresses like Emma Watson, Cate Blanchett, and Meryl Streep have publicly supported the idea that “actor” should be used universally, and many others in the industry have followed suit.

For example, in 2015, actress Cate Blanchett made headlines when she stated that she preferred being called an actor instead of an actress, calling it a term that “reflects equality.” This sentiment is shared by many women in Hollywood, and it’s part of a larger movement toward breaking down gender-based distinctions in all areas of life.

Despite the growing trend toward using the term “actor” for both genders, there are still many who argue that “actress” is important for recognizing the unique contributions of female performers. For some, the term “actress” carries historical significance, celebrating the legacy of female actors who paved the way for future generations. The use of the word “actress” can be seen as a way to honor the specific challenges women have faced in the industry.

Historically, female performers had to fight harder for recognition, and the term “actress” was a way to highlight their achievements in a male-dominated field. Some actresses, particularly those who have had long careers in the industry, may feel a sense of pride in the term, viewing it as a reflection of their dedication and talent.

For instance, veteran actresses such as Judi Dench, Helen Mirren, and Meryl Streep have all been celebrated for their long-standing contributions to the craft of acting. For many of these performers, “actress” is a term that honors their hard work and accomplishments within a traditionally male-dominated industry.

While many still embrace the term “actress,” there is a growing number of female actors who have publicly rejected gendered language. These actors believe that the use of “actor” reflects a more progressive and inclusive view of the profession.

One notable example is actress Emma Watson, who has openly advocated for gender-neutral language in the film industry. She has stated that she prefers to be called an “actor” because it reflects equality and recognizes the universal nature of the craft, regardless of gender. In 2014, during a speech at the United Nations, Watson made a call for both men and women to be referred to equally in the entertainment industry, emphasizing the importance of gender equality in all professions.

Another example is Tessa Thompson, known for her roles in Thor: Ragnarok and Westworld. Thompson has expressed her desire to be referred to as an “actor” instead of an “actress,” believing that the term “actor” is more inclusive and reflective of her work. She has also voiced her support for equal representation and opportunities for women in Hollywood, and her stance on the language reflects her broader commitment to gender equality in the entertainment industry.

The movement toward gender-neutral language in the entertainment industry has had a significant impact on the way we view performers and their roles. By using “actor” for both men and women, the industry is sending a message that gender should not define the value of an individual’s work. The emphasis is placed on the performer’s talent, skills, and craft rather than on their gender.

This shift has also led to more discussions about equality and representation in Hollywood. The gender-neutral language movement has opened up conversations about pay equity, the representation of women in leading roles, and the need for more diverse voices in front of and behind the camera.

For example, in recent years, the #MeToo movement and the Time’s Up initiative have brought attention to the challenges faced by women in the entertainment industry, from unequal pay to harassment and lack of representation. These movements have highlighted the need for a more inclusive industry, one where gendered language is no longer a barrier to recognition and success.

As the conversation surrounding gender-neutral language continues to evolve, it’s likely that the use of “actor” for both men and women will become more widely accepted in the years to come. The push for equality and inclusivity in the entertainment industry is gaining momentum, and as more actors and actresses speak out against gendered terms, it’s becoming clearer that the term “actor” may become the default for all performers.

At the same time, the term “actress” will likely continue to be used by those who value its historical significance or feel that it represents the unique experience of women in the industry. Just as the conversation around gendered language has shifted in other professions, the acting world will likely continue to navigate these issues with sensitivity and care.

Ultimately, whether a female actor is called an “actor” or “actress” may depend on personal preference, but one thing is clear: the future of acting is increasingly defined by the performer’s talent, not their gender.

Acting Magazine Newsletters

Never miss out on the best from Acting Magazine.

Sign me up for the newsletter!