What Type of Acting Did Marlon Brando Do?
Marlon Brando revolutionized the art of acting, leaving an indelible mark on cinema with his groundbreaking performances and deeply immersive technique. His approach, often associated with the Method Acting technique, brought a new level of realism and emotional depth to the screen, influencing generations of actors after him.
Method Acting and Brando’s Revolutionary Style
Marlon Brando was a prominent practitioner of Method Acting, a technique derived from the Stanislavski System, which was later refined by Lee Strasberg and Stella Adler. This approach emphasizes deep emotional identification with a character, drawing upon personal experiences to create authentic performances.
Brando himself trained under Stella Adler, who emphasized imagination over personal memory, differing slightly from Strasberg’s emphasis on emotional recall. This foundation gave Brando an uncanny ability to disappear into his roles and deliver performances that felt raw, natural, and deeply human.
“Acting is the expression of a neurotic impulse. It’s a bum’s life. The principal benefit acting has afforded me is the money to pay for my psychoanalysis.” – Marlon Brando
While Brando sometimes criticized the excessive romanticization of Method Acting, his performances embodied its most powerful aspects. He famously immersed himself in his characters’ psychological and emotional states, often making unpredictable choices that electrified the screen.
The Naturalistic Revolution
Before Brando, Hollywood acting was often stylized, theatrical, and somewhat artificial. Brando rejected these conventions, favoring naturalistic acting that emphasized spontaneity, improvisation, and genuine emotional reactions. His performances often felt unrehearsed and organic, bringing a fresh intensity to his roles.
One of his most famous performances, as Stanley Kowalski in A Streetcar Named Desire (1951), is a prime example of this style. His portrayal of the brutish and passionate Stanley was raw, visceral, and uninhibited, breaking away from traditional stage acting. Critics and audiences were stunned by his ability to blend brutality with vulnerability, making Stanley both terrifying and oddly sympathetic.
“An actor’s a guy who, if you ain’t talking about him, ain’t listening.” – Marlon Brando
His improvisational instincts also set him apart. In On the Waterfront (1954), his famous “I coulda been a contender” scene showcased a quiet, brooding intensity that revolutionized film acting. His ability to make scripted lines sound like spontaneous thoughts gave his performances a deeply authentic quality.
Brando’s Influence from Stella Adler
Brando’s training with Stella Adler was a significant influence on his acting philosophy. Adler’s approach focused on using imagination and analysis rather than reliving personal trauma. This method allowed Brando to fully transform into his characters without relying solely on personal emotional recall.
Adler later recalled how Brando stood out from other actors: “Marlon had an extraordinary gift. He had a wild kind of genius about him.”
Adler’s training helped Brando develop his ability to convey deep emotions with subtlety. He could communicate volumes through a single look or a pause, making his performances mesmerizing. His work in The Godfather (1972) as Vito Corleone, for example, relied heavily on his ability to internalize emotions, exuding power and presence even in moments of silence.
Improvisation and Unpredictability
One of Brando’s defining characteristics as an actor was his willingness to experiment and improvise. He often deviated from scripts, making spontaneous choices that added realism and unpredictability to his performances.
A famous example of this is in The Godfather, where he stuffed his cheeks with cotton balls to create the distinct voice and appearance of Don Corleone. This seemingly minor choice helped define one of cinema’s most iconic characters.
Similarly, in Apocalypse Now (1979), Brando’s portrayal of Colonel Kurtz was almost entirely improvised, as he refused to follow the script. Instead, he created a haunting, enigmatic character that added to the film’s mystique.
“Never confuse the size of your paycheck with the size of your talent.” – Marlon Brando
This approach made working with Brando challenging for directors, but it also led to some of the most memorable performances in film history.
The Physicality of Brando’s Acting
Brando’s acting wasn’t just about psychology and improvisation—it was also intensely physical. He had a way of using his body to express emotion, whether it was Stanley Kowalski’s aggressive swagger or Don Corleone’s slow, deliberate movements.
He understood that acting is more than just words; posture, facial expressions, and gestures all played a role in his performances. This was especially evident in Last Tango in Paris (1972), where his use of body language conveyed a profound sense of grief and longing.
Brando’s Legacy in Acting
Marlon Brando’s influence on acting cannot be overstated. He paved the way for modern screen acting, inspiring figures such as Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, Jack Nicholson, Daniel Day-Lewis, and Leonardo DiCaprio. His emphasis on realism, emotional depth, and improvisation changed the way actors approached their craft.
Even decades after his prime, his performances remain the gold standard for authenticity in acting. His ability to make audiences forget they were watching an actor is what made him truly legendary.
“The only thing an actor owes his public is not to bore them.” – Marlon Brando
Conclusion
Marlon Brando’s acting style was a fusion of Method Acting, naturalism, improvisation, and physical expression. His performances redefined what was possible in film, bringing a raw and unpredictable quality that captivated audiences. Whether through his brooding intensity, his masterful use of improvisation, or his effortless physicality, Brando remains one of the greatest actors of all time. His work continues to inspire actors and filmmakers, ensuring that his legacy as a true pioneer of modern acting endures.