Measure for Measure: A Review
Justice, Mercy, and the Hypocrisies of Power in Shakespeare’s Dark Comedy
(By Javier Guerra)
William Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure is a unique and often controversial entry in the Bard’s body of work. Neither a pure comedy nor a pure tragedy, the play is categorized by scholars as a “problem play” for its uneasy blending of tones and moral ambiguity. Written around 1603–1604, it tackles issues of justice, power, sexual morality, and mercy, and it continues to challenge and intrigue audiences over 400 years later.
Set in Vienna, the play follows the sudden departure of Duke Vincentio, who leaves his deputy Angelo in charge. Angelo’s strict enforcement of the city’s neglected morality laws leads to the arrest of Claudio, who is sentenced to death for impregnating his fiancée. Claudio’s sister, Isabella, a novice nun, pleads for mercy—only to be propositioned by Angelo: he will spare her brother if she surrenders her virginity.
This moral conundrum drives the plot and exposes the hypocrisies of those in power. As Isabella says:
“O, it is excellent
To have a giant’s strength; but it is tyrannous
To use it like a giant.”
Plot Overview: Disguise, Deceit, and Divine Justice
The narrative begins with Duke Vincentio ostensibly leaving Vienna in Angelo’s hands. In truth, the Duke disguises himself as a friar to observe how his deputy governs. Angelo’s rigid application of justice soon reveals his hypocrisy: he condemns Claudio for fornication, yet seeks to exploit Isabella for the same offense.
Isabella, torn between her chastity and her brother’s life, refuses Angelo’s offer. The disguised Duke then orchestrates a complex plan involving Mariana, a woman formerly betrothed to Angelo. In a classic Shakespearean “bed trick,” Mariana takes Isabella’s place, unknowingly consummating her old engagement.
Claudio is spared, Angelo is exposed, and the Duke resumes his rightful place. He proposes to Isabella, but her response is famously ambiguous—Shakespeare leaves her answer unstated.
“Some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall.” – Escalus
This line captures the play’s central theme: the arbitrary and often inverted nature of justice in a flawed world.
Major Themes: Justice, Mercy, and the Abuse of Power
Measure for Measure explores the tension between justice and mercy. Angelo’s strict, punitive approach contrasts with Isabella’s pleas for compassion. Shakespeare examines whether moral laws should be absolute or tempered by human understanding.
“Why, all the souls that were, were forfeit once;
And He that might the vantage best have took
Found out the remedy.”
Isabella’s argument here is deeply theological: even divine justice allowed for mercy. Her reasoning reflects one of the play’s persistent questions—should we judge others without remembering our own faults?
Power and corruption are also central. Angelo, given unchecked authority, abuses it under the guise of virtue. The Duke, while arguably more benevolent, also manipulates events from the shadows, raising ethical questions about surveillance and deception.
Sexual morality and hypocrisy fuel the plot’s conflict. Claudio’s arrest, Angelo’s exploitation, and the Duke’s clandestine schemes all reveal how societal expectations around sex are inconsistently applied.
Character Analysis: A Web of Contradictions
Isabella is often the moral compass of the play. Her commitment to virtue is unwavering, yet her choices invite debate. Should she have sacrificed herself for her brother? Is she cold, or is she principled? Her defiance of Angelo’s demand shows remarkable strength:
“More than our brother is our chastity.”
Angelo is the embodiment of hypocrisy. Initially perceived as austere and incorruptible, he is soon revealed to be deeply flawed. His descent is not gradual—he falls spectacularly and swiftly, showing how even the most righteous-seeming figures can succumb to temptation.
Duke Vincentio is enigmatic. He engineers events with Machiavellian flair, testing his subjects under the guise of a friar. Though his motives may be noble, his methods are manipulative. He exposes Angelo, saves Claudio, and proposes to Isabella—yet he, too, evades clear moral judgment.
Claudio, while sympathetic, is not blameless. He accepts responsibility for his actions but is quick to urge Isabella to sacrifice her virtue to save his life, showing fear and weakness under pressure.
Lucio, the comic relief, serves as a voice of irreverent truth. Though often crude and self-serving, he calls out the Duke’s faults and mocks authority. In the end, he is punished harshly, perhaps unfairly, for his candor.
“It oft falls out, to have what we would have,
We speak not what we mean.” – Lucio
Staging and Performance: Balancing Tone and Tension
Staging Measure for Measure poses unique challenges. Directors must navigate its tonal shifts—from courtroom drama to romantic comedy, from moral allegory to political satire. The setting of Vienna is often portrayed as a morally decaying city ripe for reform, but interpretations vary from dystopian urban landscapes to abstract minimalist spaces.
Angelo and Isabella’s confrontation must be handled delicately. Their scenes brim with tension, power imbalance, and potential trauma. Likewise, the Duke’s interactions while disguised raise ethical questions that modern directors often highlight.
Some productions emphasize the dark undertones, portraying the Duke as manipulative and Isabella as a victim of a corrupt patriarchal system. Others lean into the comic resolution, downplaying the discomfort of the so-called “happy ending.”
“The tempter or the tempted, who sins most?” – Angelo
This rhetorical question speaks to the heart of every performance: how are guilt and innocence assigned, and who holds the power to decide?
Critical Reception: A Play for Troubled Times
Critics have long wrestled with Measure for Measure’s complexity. Its fluctuating tone and morally ambiguous characters made it less popular historically than Shakespeare’s lighter comedies. However, in the 20th and 21st centuries, the play has gained critical appreciation for its modern relevance.
Feminist scholars highlight Isabella’s agency, even while critiquing the male characters’ control over her fate. Legal and political commentators use the play as a lens to explore authoritarianism, justice reform, and sexual politics.
The ambiguous ending also garners attention. Isabella’s silence in response to the Duke’s marriage proposal has launched endless debates. Does she accept him? Does she have a choice? Shakespeare provides no easy answer, forcing each generation to interpret her fate anew.
“Haste still pays haste, and leisure answers leisure;
Like doth quit like, and Measure still for Measure.”
The title’s line suggests cosmic balance, yet the events of the play often feel unjust. Shakespeare resists neat moral closure, reflecting life’s complexity rather than idealizing it.
Famous Lines: The Bard’s Ethical Echoes
Shakespeare’s language in Measure for Measure is rich with insight, irony, and rhetorical brilliance. Some lines remain particularly resonant:
“Our doubts are traitors,
And make us lose the good we oft might win,
By fearing to attempt.” – Lucio (to Isabella)
“The miserable have no other medicine
But only hope.” – Claudio
“Condemn the fault and not the actor of it?” – Angelo
“Go to your bosom;
Knock there, and ask your heart what it doth know.” – Duke Vincentio
Each of these lines echoes the play’s central themes—fear, hope, self-judgment, and moral reflection. They contribute to the play’s enduring philosophical impact.
Conclusion: A Drama for Every Age
Measure for Measure is not easily digestible, nor should it be. It presents difficult questions and refuses to answer them cleanly. Its characters are flawed and its justice imperfect. But it is precisely this ambiguity that makes the play timeless.
Whether viewed through a lens of gender politics, legal theory, or spiritual morality, the play offers a powerful critique of those who wield power without accountability. It also offers hope—that mercy can temper justice, that forgiveness can restore, and that even the most corrupt systems can be reformed.
In a world still grappling with the abuse of power and the meaning of justice, Measure for Measure feels strikingly contemporary.
“Truth is truth
To the end of reckoning.”
And that, perhaps, is Shakespeare’s final measure.