Did Meryl Streep Use Method Acting?
Meryl Streep is widely regarded as one of the greatest actresses of her generation. With a career spanning over five decades and countless accolades, she has earned a reputation for her transformative performances, impeccable range, and dedication to her craft. However, one question that often arises when discussing Streep’s approach to acting is whether she has ever employed the technique known as “Method Acting.”
In this article, we will explore the relationship between Meryl Streep and Method Acting, examining whether she has used this approach in her career and how her acting style compares to the principles of Method Acting.
What is Method Acting?
Before diving into Streep’s acting techniques, it’s essential to understand what Method Acting is. Method Acting is a technique developed by Lee Strasberg at the Actors Studio in the 1950s. It is based on the idea that an actor should draw on their own personal experiences and emotions to create a realistic and emotionally authentic performance. Method actors immerse themselves deeply into their characters, often living and thinking like them even offstage or off-camera, in an effort to produce the most genuine, raw, and emotional portrayal.
Some of the most famous proponents of Method Acting include Marlon Brando, Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, and Daniel Day-Lewis. These actors are known for their intense preparation and commitment to their roles, often going to extreme lengths to embody their characters, from adopting their mannerisms to living in the same conditions as their characters.
Meryl Streep and the Acting Craft
Meryl Streep, unlike some of her Method-acting counterparts, is not typically associated with the rigid, immersive techniques that define the Method. However, Streep’s acting process is known for being highly detailed, thoughtful, and nuanced, which often leads to comparisons with Method Acting.
Throughout her career, Streep has said that she doesn’t adhere to any single acting technique, but instead relies on a combination of various methods and approaches. She believes in finding the right process for each individual role, and her versatility as an actress is one of her defining features. Streep once explained her approach to acting in an interview with The New Yorker, stating:
“I don’t think there’s one way to approach a role. You have to be open to everything. Sometimes you work from the outside in, and sometimes you work from the inside out. Sometimes it’s about your emotional state, and other times, it’s about finding the physicality of the character.”
This mindset reflects the flexibility and adaptability that Streep brings to her roles, often drawing on different techniques depending on the demands of the character she is playing.
Meryl Streep’s Methodical Preparation
Though Streep doesn’t strictly adhere to Method Acting, she is known for her methodical approach to preparation. In many of her roles, she has employed techniques that align with certain aspects of Method Acting. For instance, she often spends extensive time researching her characters, immersing herself in their world, and working on their accents, mannerisms, and physical transformations.
One of Streep’s most famous performances is her portrayal of Margaret Thatcher in The Iron Lady (2011), for which she won an Academy Award for Best Actress. In preparation for the role, Streep spent months studying the former British Prime Minister’s speeches, interviews, and public appearances. She also worked on perfecting Thatcher’s distinctive accent, which required considerable vocal training.
In an interview with The Guardian, Streep explained her dedication to portraying Thatcher authentically:
“I just watched so many tapes of her, and I tried to understand her, her thinking. I think you have to get to know a person’s interior life, their way of thinking, in order to truly portray them. It’s about finding the core of what makes them who they are.”
This level of research and commitment to understanding her character is a hallmark of Streep’s acting process, and while it’s not strictly Method Acting, it shares some similarities, particularly in its focus on deeply inhabiting the character’s psychology and personal world.
Immersion in Roles: Not Quite Method, but Close
Meryl Streep is known for her dedication to immersing herself in her roles, sometimes to the point of adopting the character’s lifestyle and habits outside of filming. While this approach is not characteristic of the traditional Method Acting model, it does resemble some of the immersive techniques associated with it.
For example, for her role as the distraught mother in Sophie’s Choice (1982), Streep became deeply immersed in the character’s emotional and psychological trauma. In an interview with The New York Times, she described how she had to get herself into a certain emotional state to portray Sophie, a Polish Holocaust survivor:
“You have to go to places you don’t want to go. You have to find those hidden places of pain. For Sophie, it was about the loss, the grief, and the guilt. And I found that I could only connect with those emotions by tapping into some of my own experiences.”
Streep’s approach here highlights an important distinction from traditional Method Acting: while she uses her own emotional experiences to connect with the character, she does not necessarily live as Sophie outside of filming. Instead, she uses her personal emotions as a tool for channeling the character’s pain and suffering.
Another example of Streep’s dedication to her roles is her portrayal of Julia Child in Julie & Julia (2009). Streep took extensive cooking lessons to ensure she could authentically portray the legendary chef, and she worked tirelessly to master Child’s voice and physicality.
Streep once commented on the role:
“I knew I had to learn how to cook in the same way that Julia did, to understand the joy she found in it. But I also had to make sure that I understood the humor in her, the way she used her voice and her body to communicate.”
Her commitment to the role of Julia Child demonstrates the depth of her preparation and the care she takes in shaping every aspect of a character, even down to their physical presence.
The Limits of Method Acting
While Streep shares some similarities with Method actors in her intense preparation and emotional connection to her roles, there are notable differences. One of the key tenets of Method Acting is the idea of “living” as the character, often to the detriment of the actor’s personal well-being. Some Method actors, like Daniel Day-Lewis, are known to remain in character on and off set, sometimes making it difficult for those around them to engage with them outside of their roles.
Meryl Streep, however, has always emphasized the importance of maintaining boundaries between her personal life and her work. She is known for being able to step into and out of her characters with relative ease, avoiding the kind of emotional turmoil or instability that some Method actors experience during intense roles.
In a 2011 interview with Vogue, Streep discussed the challenge of balancing the demands of acting with her personal life:
“I don’t let myself become the character in a way that would affect my relationships or my happiness. I think it’s important to have a healthy separation. But you do have to give yourself over to the role, at least to some degree. It’s about finding a balance between the work and your life outside of it.”
This statement suggests that Streep may not fully subscribe to the emotional toll that Method Acting can sometimes take on its practitioners. Instead, she embraces a more measured approach to her craft, one that allows her to inhabit her roles fully while maintaining her sense of self.
Meryl Streep’s Legacy
Ultimately, while Meryl Streep may not be a “Method actor” in the traditional sense, her dedication to her craft and her willingness to explore a wide range of techniques and approaches to acting are what have made her one of the most respected actresses of her time. Whether it’s through intensive research, physical transformation, or emotional immersion, Streep has always brought a deep authenticity to her performances.
Her ability to adapt her approach to the specific needs of each character has allowed her to create some of the most iconic performances in cinema history. And although she may not fully embrace Method Acting as a rigid doctrine, her work often embodies the spirit of this technique—drawing on her own emotions and experiences to create profound, memorable characters.
As Streep herself has said:
“Every role I play is an opportunity to learn. I think of myself as a student of acting, and each new character is a chance to explore a different facet of human experience.”
In the end, it’s this curiosity, adaptability, and commitment to the art of acting that has allowed Meryl Streep to become one of the finest and most enduring actresses in Hollywood.
Conclusion
Meryl Streep’s approach to acting is deeply rooted in her dedication to her craft, and while she may not be a traditional Method actor, her preparation and emotional depth resonate with many of the same principles. Her ability to seamlessly adapt to a wide variety of characters, coupled with her remarkable emotional range, has made her a standout in the acting world. Whether or not she employs Method Acting, there is no doubt that Meryl Streep’s talent and versatility have earned her a place among the greatest actors of all time.
Acting Magazine Newsletters
Never miss out on the best from Acting Magazine.