The Two Gentlemen of Verona: A Review
A Look at Friendship, Betrayal, and Redemption in Shakespeare’s Early Comedy
(By Javier Guerra)
The Two Gentlemen of Verona is widely considered to be one of William Shakespeare’s earliest plays, written around 1590–1591. While it lacks the complexity and depth of his later comedies, it serves as an essential foundation for the themes, character dynamics, and stylistic devices that would define his work.
The story centers on two close friends, Valentine and Proteus, and their tangled romantic entanglements with Silvia and Julia. Themes of love, betrayal, disguise, and forgiveness swirl through the plot, setting the stage for the farcical yet heartfelt drama that unfolds. Despite the simplicity of its structure, the play offers moments of genuine insight, poetic language, and proto-Shakespearean humor.
“O, how this spring of love resembleth
The uncertain glory of an April day!”
These lines capture both the tone of the play and its essential theme: the unpredictability and folly of love.
Plot Summary: Of Love and Treachery
Valentine and Proteus are best friends from Verona. Valentine departs for Milan in search of opportunity, leaving Proteus behind in the company of his beloved Julia. However, when Proteus is later sent to Milan as well, he shockingly falls in love with Silvia, the woman Valentine also adores.
What follows is a web of deception: Proteus betrays both his friend and his first love, Julia. Meanwhile, Julia, heartbroken, disguises herself as a pageboy to follow Proteus and ends up serving him unknowingly. Silvia resists both Proteus and the Duke’s chosen suitor, Thurio, remaining loyal to Valentine.
In a climactic and controversial scene, Proteus attempts to force his affection on Silvia, only to be thwarted by Valentine. Yet, in the spirit of forgiveness, Valentine pardons his friend, and the play concludes with reconciliations and romantic unions.
“Love is your master, for he masters you;
And he that is so yokèd by a fool
Methinks should not be chronicled for wise.”
Themes: Love, Friendship, and Forgiveness
The most prominent theme in The Two Gentlemen of Verona is the tension between love and friendship. Proteus’s betrayal of both Valentine and Julia calls into question the stability of bonds between men when romantic desire intervenes. While Valentine’s forgiveness at the end seems abrupt to modern audiences, it reflects the play’s larger interest in redemption and reconciliation.
“Who is Silvia? what is she,
That all our swains commend her?”
Silvia is the idealized object of affection, embodying the Renaissance ideal of beauty and virtue. But it’s Julia, the wronged woman, who provides the emotional core of the story. Her disguise and unwavering loyalty anticipate later Shakespearean heroines like Viola in Twelfth Night and Rosalind in As You Like It.
Another key theme is identity and disguise. Julia’s transformation into the page “Sebastian” allows her to gain insight into Proteus’s true nature. This use of disguise as a means of exploration and revelation becomes a staple in Shakespeare’s comedic repertoire.
“She dreams on him that has forgot her love;
You dote on him that cares not for your love.”
Character Breakdown: Prototypes and Paradoxes
Valentine, noble and sincere, represents the ideal friend and lover. His decision to forgive Proteus, however unrealistic it might seem, reflects the play’s emphasis on grace over vengeance.
Proteus is the most morally complex character. He shifts from loyal lover to treacherous friend with alarming speed, making him one of Shakespeare’s earliest—and most deeply flawed—antiheroes. Though his repentance is swift, it’s necessary to restore harmony to the story.
Julia is arguably the most compelling figure. Her emotional resilience, clever disguise, and courage in confronting Proteus earn audience sympathy. Shakespeare would revisit this type of cross-dressing heroine with greater depth in later works.
Silvia, while virtuous and strong-willed, is less developed than Julia. She functions more as an object of desire than a fully realized character, though her defiance of Thurio and loyalty to Valentine offer moments of agency.
Launce and Speed, the comedic servants, offer a counterpoint to the romantic entanglements of their masters. Launce’s scene with his dog Crab is famously hilarious, blending slapstick with deadpan wit.
“I am but a fool, look you; and yet I have the wit
To think my master is a kind of knave.”
Humor and Wordplay: A Light Touch with Lasting Charm
Though not as linguistically rich as Shakespeare’s later comedies, The Two Gentlemen of Verona offers ample humor, especially in the banter between servants and lovers. Puns, malapropisms, and mistaken identities abound.
Launce’s monologue about leaving his family behind, while punctuated with comic exaggeration, provides insight into loyalty and personal sacrifice. His dog, Crab, arguably the play’s most memorable non-speaking character, adds levity and visual comedy.
“This shoe is my father; no, this left shoe is my father: no, no, this left shoe is my mother.”
These absurd declarations are part of the play’s charm—proof of Shakespeare’s early experimentation with comedic rhythm and structure.
Staging and Interpretation: Modern Takes on a Classic
The Two Gentlemen of Verona is rarely performed compared to Shakespeare’s other comedies, but when it is staged, it often lends itself to inventive interpretation. Directors have placed it in modern corporate offices, 1950s Americana, or stylized Italian cityscapes to draw attention to its themes of ambition, betrayal, and loyalty.
Modern audiences often struggle with the ending—specifically, Valentine’s offer of Silvia to Proteus after his attempted assault. Many productions address this by using body language, timing, and staging to express Valentine’s sarcasm or anger, turning the line into a rebuke rather than a literal offer.
“All that was mine in Silvia I give thee.”
Handled thoughtfully, this moment can underline the moral tension at the play’s heart and spark discussions about forgiveness, accountability, and gender dynamics.
Critical Reception: A Rough Gem of the Early Canon
Critics have long debated The Two Gentlemen of Verona’s literary merit. Some consider it an awkward first step in Shakespeare’s development, full of underdeveloped characters and implausible plot points. Others appreciate it as a blueprint for future brilliance.
Noted scholar Harold Bloom suggested that while the play “exhibits very little originality,” it reveals Shakespeare’s “growing ability to manage plot, character, and language.” In other words, it’s more interesting as a preview of what’s to come than as a standalone masterpiece.
Feminist critics have focused on Julia’s strength and adaptability, calling her a precursor to Shakespeare’s later, more celebrated heroines. The problematic gender politics of the conclusion continue to fuel scholarly debate and reimaginings on the stage.
“I do repent me, as it is an evil,
And take the shame with joy.”
Proteus’s final line encapsulates the play’s message: wrongdoing can be forgiven—but only with true remorse.
Famous Lines: Seeds of Poetic Genius
Shakespeare’s poetic touch is evident even in this early work. The following lines have stood the test of time:
“What light is light, if Silvia be not seen?”
“Except I be by Silvia in the night,
There is no music in the nightingale.”
“They do not love that do not show their love.”
“Love is like a child,
That longs for everything it can come by.”
These expressions of love, longing, and loss show Shakespeare honing the lyrical skills that would reach full bloom in Romeo and Juliet, Much Ado About Nothing, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream.
Conclusion: A Play of Potential and Precedent
The Two Gentlemen of Verona is not Shakespeare’s finest play—but it is a vital part of his journey. With its themes of romantic confusion, friendship tested, and identities disguised, it previews the far richer comedies that follow. It also introduces archetypes that will become central to Shakespeare’s world: the faithful woman in disguise, the repentant traitor, the witty servant, and the forgiving hero.
Its flaws—abrupt emotional shifts, implausible resolutions—do not diminish its charm. Instead, they offer a glimpse of a young playwright finding his voice, experimenting with structure, and daring to blend earnest feeling with comic form.
As a dramatic work, it is often overlooked. But as a piece of literary history, The Two Gentlemen of Verona is invaluable.
“Hope is a lover’s staff; walk hence with that
And manage it against despairing thoughts.”
Indeed, the play walks with hope, not perfection—and for that reason, it still speaks to us today.